Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

3 Subjects

Group Project Responses

Group Project Responses

Q Braddock v. Braddock On what important point did the dissent disagree with the majority and why?

Q How do you view David's statements and John's actions? Did David take unethical advantage?

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

In context to the case scenario of Braddock v. Braddock, i would say that the dissent disagreed with the majority just because they continued a debated discussion on whether David’s word actually gave an assurance upon. They basically took up the decision that both John’s profession and family standard did give them an appropriate reason as to why they should believe that it was completely unreasonable for John to consider David offer as a form of reliable or dependable assurance just because of the fact that he was not technically qualified for the job (Braddock v Braddock, 2009).